Kenya’s Political Violence: A Call For Urgent Reform And Accountability
By: James Kilonzo Bwire
Worth Noting:
- Gachagua’s experience at the funeral—where mourners, including children, were attacked by armed assailants—serves as a stark reminder of the precarious situation many politicians face. His assertion that the state was complicit in this violence raises critical questions about governmental responsibility and protection for all citizens, particularly those who have served at high levels of office. The expectation that security should extend beyond one’s term in office is not merely a privilege but a fundamental right that should be guaranteed to all public servants.
- The withdrawal of Gachagua’s security detail following his impeachment is particularly troubling. While it is common practice for security to be scaled back after leaving office, Gachagua argues that his situation is unique due to ongoing legal challenges against his impeachment.
The attack on former Deputy President Rigathi Gachagua during a funeral in Limuru has ignited serious concerns about the safety of political figures in Kenya and the government’s role in perpetuating violence. Gachagua’s claims that the withdrawal of his security detail was a deliberate act to leave him vulnerable are not just alarming; they reflect a broader pattern of political violence that has plagued Kenya for decades.
Political violence in Kenya is not a new phenomenon. It has deep roots, often intertwined with ethnic tensions and power struggles. Historical accounts reveal that political leaders have frequently used violence as a tool to achieve their objectives, creating an environment where dissent is met with aggression rather than constructive dialogue. This trend has escalated during election periods, with significant spikes in violence recorded during the lead-up to elections. For example, in 2022 alone, over 1,060 incidents of political disorder were reported, marking the highest levels since 1997. The violence witnessed at Gachagua’s funeral mirrors past incidents where political rivalries have culminated in brutal confrontations. The post-election violence of 2007-2008 resulted in over 1,000 deaths and displaced hundreds of thousands, revealing how deeply entrenched political affiliations can incite communal violence.
Gachagua’s experience at the funeral—where mourners, including children, were attacked by armed assailants—serves as a stark reminder of the precarious situation many politicians face. His assertion that the state was complicit in this violence raises critical questions about governmental responsibility and protection for all citizens, particularly those who have served at high levels of office. The expectation that security should extend beyond one’s term in office is not merely a privilege but a fundamental right that should be guaranteed to all public servants.
The withdrawal of Gachagua’s security detail following his impeachment is particularly troubling. While it is common practice for security to be scaled back after leaving office, Gachagua argues that his situation is unique due to ongoing legal challenges against his impeachment. He contends that this withdrawal left him exposed to potential harm, a claim he has backed with assertions of previous assassination attempts against him.
In light of these events, it is imperative for leaders across the political spectrum to prioritize the safety and security of all Kenyans. President William Ruto’s silence on Gachagua’s allegations only exacerbates concerns regarding government accountability. If leaders fail to protect their own, what message does this send to ordinary citizens? The normalization of political violence undermines democratic discourse and erodes trust in government institutions. Moreover, Gachagua’s call for Ruto to be held responsible for any harm that comes to him reflects a growing discontent within the ranks of Kenyan leadership. The former Deputy President’s remarks suggest that personal grievances are increasingly overshadowing national interests, which could lead to further divisions and unrest.
Kenya’s history of political violence is deeply intertwined with its colonial past and subsequent governance failures. Ethnic tensions have been manipulated by politicians seeking power, leading to cycles of violence that often erupt during election periods. The government has frequently turned a blind eye to these issues, allowing impunity for perpetrators while failing to address the root causes of conflict. Reports indicate that state-sponsored vigilantes and militias have been used by politicians to intimidate opponents and suppress dissenting voices. This cycle must be broken if Kenya hopes to create a stable and peaceful society.
As Kenyans reflect on these unsettling realities, there is an urgent need for comprehensive reforms aimed at curbing political violence and ensuring accountability. This includes strengthening legal frameworks that protect individuals from politically motivated violence and ensuring swift justice for perpetrators. Promoting dialogue between opposing political factions can foster understanding and reduce tensions. Enhancing security protocols by establishing clear guidelines regarding the security needs of former public officials—especially those facing legal challenges or threats—is essential. Additionally, community engagement involving local communities in discussions about safety and security can help rebuild trust between citizens and law enforcement agencies.
The tragic events surrounding Gachagua’s attack should serve as a wake-up call for all stakeholders involved in Kenya’s governance. A commitment to uphold the rule of law and protect every citizen—regardless of their political affiliation—is essential for fostering a peaceful and democratic society. As Kenya navigates its complex political landscape, it must confront the uncomfortable reality of political violence head-on. Only through collective action can the nation hope to build a future where safety is guaranteed for all its citizens, allowing democracy to flourish without fear or intimidation.
In conclusion, addressing the underlying causes of political violence in Kenya requires a multifaceted approach that acknowledges historical grievances while promoting unity and accountability among leaders. The path forward must prioritize human rights and justice as fundamental pillars for sustainable peace and stability in Kenya’s vibrant democracy. Without decisive action from both government officials and civil society, the cycle of violence will continue to threaten not only political figures like Gachagua but also ordinary Kenyans who deserve safety and security in their daily lives.
James Kilonzo Bwire is a Media and Communication Practitioner.
