Beyond Plato and Hobbes: When those who govern become the greatest threat to governance
The Mt Kenya Times 
Mr. Fredrick K Chelimo – PWD
Email: fkipchelimo@yahoo.com
The greatest challenge facing modern democracy is not simply the absence of good leaders. It is the existence of political systems that can be manipulated by those who occupy political office to protect their own power, privileges and interests. This is the uncomfortable truth that must be confronted if we are serious about political transformation. A country can have an excellent constitution, independent institutions, sophisticated laws and regular elections, yet still fail to achieve good governance if the political class continually redesigns the rules of the game to protect itself.
Plato worried about the dangers of ignorant and selfish rulers. Thomas Hobbes worried about the chaos that would emerge when there was no strong authority to maintain order. Machiavelli understood that political power could be pursued and preserved through methods that were often far removed from morality. But the modern world has created a new political dilemma that perhaps requires an entirely new philosophical response: what happens when those entrusted with governing become the greatest obstacle to the effective functioning of the institutions of government?.
In a healthy democracy, parliament should make laws that apply fairly to everyone. The executive should implement those laws. The judiciary should interpret them independently. Oversight institutions should hold power accountable. Citizens should ultimately remain sovereign. Yet in many countries, including Kenya, the political class has accumulated privileges and protections that can create the impression that elected office is not a temporary public responsibility but a permanent social elevation.
Politicians sometimes design systems in which they appear to live by different rules from the citizens they represent. They determine their own remuneration, create generous benefits, negotiate retirement packages, enjoy extensive privileges and surround themselves with titles and ceremonial honours that can gradually create a culture of political entitlement. The ordinary citizen is told to tighten the belt, while political institutions can appear increasingly comfortable with expanding their own privileges. This creates a dangerous psychological distance between the governed and those who govern.
A teacher may spend an entire career educating generations of children and retire with modest security. A nurse may spend decades caring for the sick under difficult conditions. A farmer may work from dawn to dusk yet remain vulnerable to poor markets, drought and rising costs. A police officer may risk his or her life protecting society. A civil servant may dedicate decades to public service. Yet political office can sometimes offer individuals extraordinary financial and social rewards within a comparatively short period. The question is not whether elected leaders should be compensated fairly. They should. The question is whether public office should become a pathway to privileges that are disconnected from the economic realities of the citizens who finance the state.
Democracy begins to lose its moral authority when citizens conclude that politics is no longer about service but about access. The danger becomes even greater when political leaders weaken the very institutions designed to hold them accountable. An independent judiciary can be portrayed as hostile to government. Oversight bodies can be starved of resources or subjected to political pressure. Parliament can become more interested in protecting its institutional privileges than scrutinising the executive. Political parties can become personal vehicles rather than democratic organisations. Public appointments can reward loyalty instead of competence.
In such circumstances, the problem is not merely bad leadership. It is institutional capture by political interests. This is why the next stage of political philosophy must go beyond Plato’s philosopher-king and Hobbes’s powerful sovereign. We do not need a new generation of rulers who are merely more intelligent or more powerful. We need a political system designed on the assumption that every human being who acquires power is capable of abusing it. The solution is therefore not to search endlessly for perfect leaders. It is to construct imperfectible institutions that make it difficult for even powerful leaders to do great harm.
The central principle should be simple: political power must never be allowed to become self-protecting power. No arm of government should be permitted to design rules that effectively place itself above accountability. No elected institution should have unlimited authority to determine its own financial privileges without independent scrutiny. Public remuneration should be guided by transparent and objective principles that reflect the economic capacity of the country. Retirement benefits should be fair, sustainable and consistent with the broader public service system. The dignity of public office should come from service, not from extravagant titles, privileges or material rewards.
A member of parliament should be respected because they represent the people—not because the title makes them appear socially superior to the people. A cabinet secretary should be honoured because they serve the nation—not because their office places them beyond criticism. A president should be respected because they embody the constitutional authority of the republic—not because they are treated as politically infallible. This distinction is fundamental. In a democracy, leaders are servants of the state, not owners of the state.
Kenya’s political transformation must therefore involve a re-engineering of the relationship between politics and the other arms of government. Parliament must become a genuine institution of legislation and oversight rather than an arena where political interests dominate national debate. The executive must be powerful enough to govern but constrained enough to remain accountable. The judiciary must be protected from political interference. Independent commissions must be genuinely independent. The media and civil society must remain free to question power.
But institutional reform alone will not be enough. The citizen must also be re-engineered from a passive voter into an active constitutional participant. Citizens must begin to ask different questions. Instead of asking, “Which tribe is this leader from?” they should ask, “What has this leader delivered?” Instead of celebrating political generosity during campaigns, they should ask how public resources were managed over the previous five years. Instead of being impressed by motorcades, titles and political theatrics, citizens should examine competence, integrity and measurable results.
The political class survives when citizens reward performance theatrics more than actual performance. The future therefore belongs to a new political culture in which public office is understood as a temporary trust. Leaders should enter office knowing that they will leave it, and institutions should be designed to ensure that their departure does not threaten the stability of the country. The state must be stronger than the individual, the constitution stronger than the politician, and the citizen stronger than the political party.
This is the foundation of what can be called Democratic Stewardship—a political philosophy in which power is understood not as personal ownership but as temporary custodianship of the common good. Its principles should be clear: power must be legitimate; power must be limited; power must be transparent; power must be accountable; power must deliver; and power must always remember the generations yet unborn.
Such a philosophy would retain Plato’s emphasis on wisdom, Hobbes’s concern for security and Machiavelli’s understanding of political reality, but it would add a defining principle of modern democracy: the dignity, rights and sovereignty of the citizen. The ultimate test of political transformation is therefore not whether we can find better politicians. It is whether we can build a political system in which good governance does not depend entirely on finding good politicians. That is the real revolution Kenya and the world need.
The political class should not be the enemy of government. It should be the first servant of government, constitution and citizen. And perhaps the most important lesson for our generation is this: the greatness of a democracy is not measured by how highly it elevates its leaders, but by how effectively it prevents any leader from rising above the law, the constitution and the people.
That is the political philosophy of the future. Not the rule of philosopher-kings. Not the absolute power of sovereigns. Not the politics of Machiavellian survival. But a system in which institutions are wiser than individuals, the constitution is stronger than politicians, citizens are more powerful than political parties, and public office is permanently understood as a privilege of service rather than a licence for entitlement.
Only then can democracy move from being a periodic contest for power to becoming what it was always meant to be: a permanent system of government by, for and accountable to the people.
Similar Posts by The Mt Kenya Times:
- CJ launches Kisii county alternative justice systems action plan to expand access to justice
- The silent pressure of being young: Choosing purpose over popularity
- The thirst of technology: When innovation’s chorus drowns the rivers
- KUSU demands salary protection and funding for universities
- Mt Kenya Times ePAPER August 4, 2026
About the Author
Dan 