Universities Academic Staff Union leadership
As lecturers and their employers trade threats across the bargaining table, it is the student sitting in the lecture hall who has the most to lose
By Collins Kibet
Kenya’s public universities are once again edging towards crisis after university unions rejected the latest pay offer, raising the prospect of another lecturers’ strike at a time when students can least afford the disruption. As negotiations between university workers and their employers continue to deteriorate, one question demands urgent attention: who will ultimately pay the price if lecturers down their tools?
The Universities Academic Staff Union and other university workers’ unions have raised concerns spanning salaries, allowances, medical benefits, staffing levels, and the financing of the 2025–2029 Collective Bargaining Agreement. They have rejected the proposed package as inadequate. The employers, for their part, are constrained by the familiar pressures of public-sector budgeting. Between those two positions sits a widening gap — and in that gap, as has happened before, stand thousands of students whose academic lives could once again be placed on hold through no fault of their own.
A lecturers’ strike is never simply a dispute between employers and employees. The moment industrial action begins, its consequences ripple outward rapidly — cancelled lectures, postponed examinations, disrupted academic calendars, and deepening uncertainty about graduation timelines. For students already stretched by the cost of accommodation, food, transport, and university fees, a prolonged interruption does not just affect their timetables. It compounds financial and emotional pressure on families who continue paying those costs while waiting for learning to resume.
The harder question is what this recurring cycle of breakdown and brinkmanship reveals about the structural state of Kenya’s public university system. The country has steadily expanded university enrolment over the past decade, absorbing tens of thousands of additional students into institutions whose core funding has not kept pace. Lecturers carry heavier workloads. Research suffers. Support services strain under the pressure. And every few years, the unresolved tension between what universities are expected to deliver and what they are given to work with surfaces again at the bargaining table, with students bearing the consequences of decisions made well above their heads.
This is not to suggest that government resources are unlimited or that every demand from the unions is straightforwardly achievable. Kenya faces substantial competing obligations across health, infrastructure, debt servicing, and social protection. The challenge of balancing workers’ legitimate demands against available public funds is real, and no serious analysis can pretend otherwise. But the question is not only whether the money exists — it is whether the process through which agreements are reached is fit for purpose. Collective bargaining agreements that become urgent only when strike deadlines approach, that spend years in negotiation before collapsing into confrontation, represent a failure of institutional design as much as a failure of will.
There is also the question of staffing that sits beneath the pay dispute. If student numbers continue to rise while universities struggle to recruit and retain sufficient permanent academic staff, workloads will keep increasing, research output will remain under pressure, and the quality of teaching will be difficult to sustain. Kenya’s ambitions to build a competitive knowledge economy rest, more than most policy documents acknowledge, on the people standing at the front of lecture halls and supervising postgraduate research. Underinvesting in them is not a neutral financial decision — it is a choice about what kind of higher education system the country wants to have.
For students, none of this is abstract. Behind every interrupted lecture is a learner working towards a degree. Behind every postponed examination is a student whose professional plans may be set back by months. Behind every prolonged strike is a family continuing to pay rent and buy food while the institution their child attends sits idle. The burden of these disruptions is distributed extremely unevenly — and it falls hardest on those with the least capacity to absorb it.
Kenya’s public universities need predictable, adequate funding, timely collective bargaining, and genuine dialogue between employers and workers that does not require a strike deadline to concentrate minds. The longer the current standoff remains unresolved, the deeper the uncertainty grows — for staff, for institutions, and most of all for students who had no seat at the negotiating table and no say in how it was conducted.
The question now is whether the parties involved will find a lasting solution before the classroom becomes, once again, the place where the consequences of their disagreement are felt most acutely.
Similar Posts by The Mt Kenya Times:
- A Poem, a Universe: A poetry book gaze at Jumaniyoz Jabborov’s “Ko‘zgudagi sanam”
- Wicknell Chivayo: The Story That Wasn’t Told
- Wicknell Chivayo: The man Africa loved, hated and never fully understood
- Kenyans abroad are sending billions home — but are they getting a bigger seat at the table?
- A passport or a laptop: How young Kenyans are finding work beyond home