By: Midmark Onsongo
Worth Noting:
- This duality is not limited to religious texts; it’s also a reflection of the complicated nature of African politics, where leaders who claim to uphold the moral high ground often engage in corrupt or oppressive behavior. Consider countries like Zimbabwe or Sudan, where leaders, despite claiming moral or religious authority, have been accused of perpetuating violence, corruption, and human rights abuses.
- Could it be that religion, with its ambiguous moral frameworks and contradictions, has normalized this type of governance, making it harder for societies to demand true justice? Leaders may preach mercy from the pulpit, but their actions behind closed doors often reveal a very different reality, one that mirrors the contradictions found within sacred texts.
As a Socio-Geographic Scholar (SGS), I’ve had the privilege of studying the intricate relationship between social institutions and the physical landscapes they occupy. Africa, in all its diversity and richness, presents a remarkable case of how external forces—cultural, economic, and spiritual—intertwine to shape the present. Among these forces, religion stands out as one of the most pervasive influences on the continent. But here’s where the puzzle emerges: could religion, with its promise of morality, guidance, and unity, be a veiled culprit in Africa’s ongoing socio-economic struggles? Is it possible that this force, rather than elevating African societies, has perpetuated systems that hinder progress? As we dive into this inquiry, it’s essential to emphasize that this isn’t an anti-religious diatribe but a critical analysis of how religion’s influence, often well-intentioned, can sometimes create the very obstacles it seeks to eliminate.
In many parts of Africa, religion is considered the foundation upon which moral and ethical guidance is built. People seek solace in religious institutions, and leaders often align themselves with religious figures to gain public trust. However, a closer look at the contradictions embedded in religious texts reveals parallels with the contradictions evident in African leadership. Take, for example, the biblical paradox regarding divine anger. In Jeremiah 3:12, it’s asserted that God doesn’t stay angry forever, yet in Jeremiah 17:4, God’s anger is described as something that lingers indefinitely. These seemingly opposing ideas echo a broader contradiction seen in African governance, where leaders often present themselves as benevolent and forgiving, yet act with vengeance when their authority is questioned. The promise of forgiveness, redemption, and reconciliation made by political figures is frequently contradicted by the swift and brutal punishment of those who oppose them.
This duality is not limited to religious texts; it’s also a reflection of the complicated nature of African politics, where leaders who claim to uphold the moral high ground often engage in corrupt or oppressive behavior. Consider countries like Zimbabwe or Sudan, where leaders, despite claiming moral or religious authority, have been accused of perpetuating violence, corruption, and human rights abuses. Could it be that religion, with its ambiguous moral frameworks and contradictions, has normalized this type of governance, making it harder for societies to demand true justice? Leaders may preach mercy from the pulpit, but their actions behind closed doors often reveal a very different reality, one that mirrors the contradictions found within sacred texts. Another troubling aspect of religion’s influence in Africa is the pervasive dependency on divine intervention. Many Africans, deeply religious by nature, turn to prayer and religious rituals to solve their problems, often at the expense of practical, grounded solutions. In the Bible, Genesis 32:30 tells us that men have seen God face-to-face, yet John 1:18 flatly contradicts this by asserting that no man has ever seen God. This theological tension offers an interesting reflection on the broader tendency within African societies to rely on the unseen and the unknowable to address pressing social and political issues. This has led to a widespread culture of passivity, where instead of addressing systemic issues such as corruption, poor infrastructure, or lack of economic opportunities, many people turn to religious leaders for miracles and divine solutions. Politicians, aware of this dependency, are quick to invoke religious rhetoric to distract the public from more serious concerns. From elaborate prayer rallies to promises of divine protection, religion becomes a tool of manipulation. In many cases, political leaders use religious language to absolve themselves of responsibility for economic or social failures, convincing citizens that their struggles are merely part of God’s grand plan. Could it be that religion, rather than empowering Africans to confront their challenges directly, has instead created a culture of waiting—waiting for miracles, waiting for divine intervention, waiting for change that never comes?
Religion preaches righteousness, moral integrity, and the pursuit of justice. Yet, paradoxically, Africa remains one of the most corrupt regions in the world, with many of the most religious nations ranking poorly on global indices of corruption. In Romans 3:10, the Bible tells us that no one is righteous—not even one. Yet in Matthew 7:7, we are encouraged to seek righteousness, implying that it can be found if one looks hard enough. This confusion about the nature of righteousness seems to reflect a deeper problem within African societies: the pursuit of moral virtue in a system that rewards the opposite. Religious institutions often present themselves as bastions of morality, but in reality, they are frequently complicit in maintaining corrupt systems of power.
Consider the number of African politicians who donate generously to churches or mosques, attend religious services regularly, and even lead prayers during political events, only to engage in blatant acts of corruption and abuse of power once the cameras are off. These leaders use religion as a shield, convincing the public that their public displays of piety absolve them of their sins. This creates a moral landscape where appearances matter more than substance. The mere act of attending religious services or making grand religious proclamations is enough to convince many citizens that their leaders are virtuous, even when the evidence points to the contrary. One of the most significant ways religion has shaped African politics is through its role in ethnic and religious divisions. Religion and ethnicity are often closely intertwined in African countries, and these divisions have frequently been exploited by both colonial and post-colonial rulers to maintain control. This dynamic is eerily similar to the biblical confusion about the order of creation in Genesis 1:24-27 and Genesis 2:7. In one account, animals are created before man, while in the other, man comes first. This inconsistency offers a striking metaphor for the historical confusion and division sown by colonial powers, who deliberately used religion and ethnicity to fragment African societies and make them easier to rule.
Post-independence, African leaders have often continued this tradition, using religious and ethnic divisions to solidify their power. In Nigeria, for example, the ongoing conflict between Christian and Muslim communities has been exacerbated by political leaders who use religious identity as a tool for political mobilization. In Kenya, politicians frequently stoke ethnic tensions during election periods, often invoking religious language to justify their actions. Religion, which should ideally serve as a force for unity, instead becomes a weapon that deepens divisions and makes it more difficult for African societies to achieve true national cohesion.
Blind faith is perhaps one of the most dangerous aspects of religion’s influence on the African continent. In Matthew 20:29, two blind men are healed on the road, while Mark 10:46-47 describes only one man being healed in a similar setting. This biblical discrepancy about the number of healed blind men can be seen as a broader reflection on the nature of faith in Africa—how much of Africa’s problems can be traced back to blind, unquestioning faith in religious, political, or economic systems that continually fail to deliver?
Many Africans place unwavering trust in their religious leaders, believing that their prayers will bring about change. This trust is not limited to religious figures; many also blindly trust their political leaders, believing that their promises will eventually lead to prosperity. Yet time and again, these promises fall short. Citizens continue to place their faith in systems that do not serve them, allowing corrupt leaders to perpetuate their power without being held accountable. This blind faith stifles critical thinking and prevents the kind of questioning and scrutiny that is essential for any society to progress. Could it be that religion, with its emphasis on faith over reason, has made it more difficult for Africans to hold their leaders accountable?
I cannot help but wonder whether Africa’s deep entrenchment in religious belief has, in some ways, made it more susceptible to the very problems it seeks to solve. Religion, for all its promises of salvation, may have contributed to Africa’s challenges by fostering a culture of passivity, encouraging division, and normalizing contradictions in leadership. While faith undoubtedly offers strength and solace to millions, it should never replace the need for practical solutions, critical thinking, and action. Africa’s problems are complex, and while religion is not the sole cause, it is worth questioning whether its role in African society has been more of a hindrance than a help. Ultimately, faith is important, but without action, it is unlikely to bring about the meaningful change that Africa so desperately needs.
This article was scripted by;
MIDMARK ONSONGO, SGS
Similar Posts by Mt Kenya Times:
- Mt Kenya Times ePAPER May 19, 2026
- Beyond CAB3: the structural failures eroding Zimbabwe’s politics
- Ramaphosa holds firm as impeachment call tests South Africa’s GNU
- WHO declares Ebola outbreak in DRC and Uganda a global health emergency
- MKU roars to top honours in Nairobi North conference league
Mt Kenya Times 
Xinhua Media