The Repressive Policy Of The Soviet Authority In Uzbekistan In The Second Half Of The 20s And The 30s Of The 19th Century And Its Consequences

By: Orzikulov Komiljon 

Worth Noting:

• The Soviet regime, along with repression of national leaders in the judiciary, also raised the sword of punishment to intellectuals in the field of education. In August 1930, a group of leaders of the People’s Commissariat of Education of the Uzbekistan SSR was arrested in the city of Samarkand.
• People’s Commissar of Education Mannon Ramziy Mannon Abdullayev of the OzSSR was involved in the narco-compross case. they were accused of poisoning the educational system with nationalism, and this situation was condemned as a manifestation of chauvinism on the educational front. Botu and his supporters were sentenced to 10 years in prison. However, they were later shot in prison.
• The destruction of Munavvarqori and his comrades. On November 5, 1929, in Tashkent, 38 people led by marifatparvar Munavvargari Abdurashidkhanov were imprisoned. Soon after that, the number of those arrested reached 87 people.

Inogomov worked as the Head of the Press Department of the Central Committee of the OzKP(b) and the People’s Commissar of Education of the OzSSR. When it comes to the “Inogomovchilik” group, it is clear that all the accusations against it have been thoroughly investigated. It is known that Rahim Inogomov worked as the Head of the Press Department of the Central Committee of the OzKP(b) and the People’s Commissar of Education of the OzSSR.

The “Kasimovchilik” group was another fabrication deliberately organized by the Soviet ruling regime in 1929-1930 for the purpose of repressing and punishing national cadres and intellectuals. S., who served as chairman of the Supreme Court of the SSRKasimov and his close associates:

N.Aimov, Musaboyev, Sharipov, Sirojiddinov and a total of 7 others were imprisoned in the second half of 1929 on charges of complicity in the “printing” movement. They were accused of communicating with nationalist organizations in the republic. 4 members of this group were shot on such baseless charges. The rest were sentenced to many years in prison.

For the rulers of the autocratic system, the only condition for keeping the leaders and employees of the National Soviet Republic, like Uzbekistan, in full obedience is not to allow their independent activities, to shake them from time to time, to punish them cruelly if they find any mistakes or shortcomingswas the way.As a result of such an inhumane and illegal approach to the activities of national personnel, in the republic, he dedicated his conscious life and active work to the false and false ideas of the Soviet

Union and the victory of socialism. how many mature party and state leaders fought foThey drowned in the oppression.The fate of Akmal Ikramov, Fayzulla Khojayev, Abdulla Rahimboyev, Isroil Artikov, Abdulla Karimov and dozens of other local leaders, who showed selflessness for the development of Uzbekistan, the happiness of the people, ended with such a tragedy.

Soon after, the next job was found. On May 5, 1932, on June 15, the mobile session of the military collegium of the Supreme Court of the USSR held a trial against Shamsutdin Badriddinov, the former prosecutor of the Supreme Court of the Uzbek SSR, and his 5 colleagues. this time, the prosecutor was Armenian R. Katanyan, who was known for his hatred towards the Turkic peoples. Sh. Badriddinov was accused of being a close friend and associate of Munavvarqori and Sadulla Kasimov, having contacts with members of the Milli Ittihad organization and publishers. Sh. Badriddinov was first sentenced to be shot, and then the verdict was replaced by a 10-year prison sentence. Five of his comrades were also sentenced to long prison terms.

The Soviet regime, along with repression of national leaders in the judiciary, also raised the sword of punishment to intellectuals in the field of education. In August 1930, a group of leaders of the People’s Commissariat of Education of the Uzbekistan SSR was arrested in the city of Samarkand.

People’s Commissar of Education Mannon Ramziy Mannon Abdullayev of the OzSSR was involved in the narco-compross case. they were accused of poisoning the educational system with nationalism, and this situation was condemned as a manifestation of chauvinism on the educational front. Botu and his supporters were sentenced to 10 years in prison. However, they were later shot in prison.

The destruction of Munavvarqori and his comrades. On November 5, 1929, in Tashkent, 38 people led by marifatparvar Munavvargari Abdurashidkhanov were imprisoned. Soon after that, the number of those arrested reached 87 people.

They were accused of being members of the National Union and National Independence Organizations. The investigation process was later transferred to Moscow. this situation shows that the soviet regime is eager to expose the nationalism of the Jadids. On April 25, 1931, during the court session held in Moscow, 15 members of the national independence movement led by Munavvarqori were shot, and the remaining 72 peopleand he was sentenced to a long prison term.15 children of the Uzbek people were shot near Moscow. Almost no one returned to Tashkent from prison.[4]

To summarize, the repression of the “Group of 18”, “Inoghamov”, “Kasimov”, “Narkompros”, “National Union” and “National Independence” groups in the late 20s and early 30s of the XX century by the Soviet state  The basic essence of the Uzbek politics was to destroy the dream of the Uzbek people to achieve independence, to make the people easily dependent on the nation and to control the nation by using their own management method by losing the national state and national values.

The policy of repression is mainly the declaration of traitors to the state by defaming the names of persons working in high government positions, i.e. Supreme Court, prosecutors, public education and other persons, and removing them from their positions.

Done Thus, Stalin’s repression was a period filled with bloody tragedies and shameless losses for all spheres of our republic’s life.  It has left a complicated mark on the fate of millions of people and created unprecedented ugly consequences.

Despite this, our people showed their indomitable will and perseverance, strived for brighter days to come, and lived in struggle.  He withstood all the violence of the stafinish people, kept his age-old values, traditions, paintings and customs, remained loyal to his faith and always continued to move boldly towards national independence.

We, the people of the era of national independence, should always keep the memory of dear people who fought for the freedom and independence of our country and were victims of Stalinist repressions in our hearts.  The actions and courage of such persons are commendable.

Orzikulov Komiljon was born on January 21, 2002 in Narpay district of Samarkand region, currently he is a student of the 4th stage of the Faculty of History of the Navoi State Pedagogical Institute.