Deputy President Rigathi Gachagua
By: Joseph Mutua Ndonga
Worth Noting:
- After analysing and perusing the grounds listed for his removal, I realized that the MPs were leaving nothing to chance.
- The motion of impeachment was also enjoying the support of MPs from his stronghold of Mount Kenya including those from his home county of Nyeri. This was another clear indication that his goose had already been cooked.
- Some of the grounds cited were; gross violation of the constitution and other laws of the land, abuse of office, gross misconduct and violation of international laws.
- My prediction came to pass when the MPs finally cast the ballots. 281 members voted to impeach the DP while 44 voted against the motion. One member abstained.
One of the key roles of parliament is oversight of the state officers in terms of how they were performing their constitutional mandates.
The Deputy President (DP) is a principal assistant to the President. The holder of this office was therefore required to perform duties assigned to him by the President.
In light of this, the motion touching on impeachment of Deputy President falls in this category.
When I started hearing that plans were underway to impeach Deputy President Rigathi Gachagua, two questions came to mind. Did the MPs who have initiated the process stood a chance of marshalling enough numbers in parliament? Did the grounds of impeachment met the requisite threshold?
After analysing and perusing the grounds listed for his removal, I realized that the MPs were leaving nothing to chance.
The motion of impeachment was also enjoying the support of MPs from his stronghold of Mount Kenya including those from his home county of Nyeri. This was another clear indication that his goose had already been cooked.
Some of the grounds cited were; gross violation of the constitution and other laws of the land, abuse of office, gross misconduct and violation of international laws.
My prediction came to pass when the MPs finally cast the ballots. 281 members voted to impeach the DP while 44 voted against the motion. One member abstained.
With this, the spotlight now turns to the Senate where the DP will also be put on trial.
After this, the Senators will vote and many Kenyans believe they will reaffirm the resolution of the National Assembly. Out of 67, 47 senators will be required to support the ouster.
If the Senate impeaches him, Gachagua will be left with one option. Seek legal redress. He has since assembled a team of top notch lawyers. A friend of mine told me that his chances of winning were nil.
Reason? The courts’ decisions and determinations will be based on the interpretation of constitutional imperatives and other laws of the land.
Articles 145 and 150 of constitution stipulate the process of removing the DP from office.
The National Assembly had followed these provisions to the letter and spirit and many Kenyans are waiting a concurrence of the senate.
I have been listening to the remarks attributed to Gachagua’s supporters.
They were yet to drop this warped mentality that President William Ruto was behind his woes.
As we know, the President has never commented about this matter touching on impeachment of DP.
He always steered clear even when pressed to make a comment on the matter.
The President once told a journalist during a live TV interview. Gachagua is still my deputy. If you think we are not reading the same script, please look for him and ask him to respond.
Constitutionally speaking, the President has no power to interfere, influence or coerce members of parliament to vote in certain way or how to their job.
The President is not a member and hence he has no vote.
Parliament is an independent organ just like the executive which is headed by the President.
Yes, the law allows the President as the leader of ruling party/coalition to chair a meeting of the party parliamentary group. This is ahead of critical debates and this would give the MPs a free hand to build a consensus/common position.
The President is however not compelled to chair these meetings.
He can delegate someone else to do that.
In respect to Gachagua’s motion of impeachment, he never chaired the PG meeting.
This is because the MPs brought this matter at a time when he was having a busy/tight schedule.
Joseph Mutua Ndonga Is A Writer And Social Commentator
Similar Posts by The Mt Kenya Times:
- Dolly Parton: A life that gave more than it took
- Porsche 911 GT3: The driver’s car that defies the spec sheet
- Name, shame, ban: Police put violent political actors on notice ahead of 2027
- Kanja puts recruits through their paces ahead of Kiganjo passing-out
- Humbelani Priscilla Nemanzemba: Building Africa’s entrepreneurial future, one business at a time