By: Odhiambo Jerameel Kevins Owuor
The question of whether democracy serves Africa and whether it was truly ‘meant for Africans’ is a profound, dialectical challenge that excavates the continent’s layered history. It moves beyond a simple ‘yes’ or ‘no’ to engage with the legacy of imposition, the resilience of indigenous governance, and the often-thwarted aspirations of post-colonial states. Democracy, in its current liberal-pluralist manifestation, arrived in Africa not as a spontaneous internal evolution but largely as a blueprint delivered during decolonization and re-emphasized during the “third wave” of democratization, following the end of the Cold War around 1989-1994.
Inheriting the State: The Political Science and Legal Imposition
The modern African state, an artefact of the 1884-1885 Berlin Conference, inherited borders and governance structures designed for exploitation, not representation. Political science reveals that the colonial state was, by design, an apparatus of “coercive sovereignty” focused on resource extraction and administrative control, as scholars like Jeffrey Herbst argue in States and Power in Africa. Colonial administrators established centralized, hierarchical systems that actively suppressed indigenous political institutions that often contained elements of deliberative democracy. For instance, the pre-colonial Igbo system in what is now Nigeria exemplified a form of segmentary, non-centralized governance with checks and balances, which was fundamentally incompatible with the Governor-General model.
When independence arrived in the late 1950s and 1960s, a transfer of power occurred, not a true restructuring of the state. The new African elites, often schooled in the West, inherited the colonially-drawn map and the centralist, powerful legal framework. The Westminster or French models were adopted en masse. Kwame Nkrumah’s Ghana, independent in 1957, quickly moved from multi-partyism to a one-party state by 1964, a pattern echoed across the continent. This was rationalized by political leaders, arguing that a single party was necessary for ‘national unity’ and accelerated economic development, a perspective encapsulated in Julius Nyerere’s philosophy of ‘Ujamaa’ in Tanzania.
The post-independence constitutions, while enshrining fundamental rights in legal documents, were often overridden by emergency powers or executive decrees, demonstrating a fundamental disjuncture: the legal form was democratic, but the political practice was authoritarian. The numerous military coups over 200 attempted or successful coups in Africa since the 1950s, a staggering figure; became the ultimate political expression of this disconnect, undermining the constitutional order.
The Cultural Resonance: An Anthropological and Sociological Critique
To argue democracy was ‘meant for Africans’ requires engaging with pre-colonial forms of governance. Anthropology offers compelling evidence of sophisticated systems of consensus-building and accountability long predating European contact. In The African Philosophy of Governance, the concept of ‘palaver’ is central, a process-oriented, public discussion aimed at achieving societal consensus rather than simply a 51% victory.
This highlights a key sociological tension: the imposed Western model, with its adversarial party politics and ‘winner-takes-all’ electoralism, often mapped onto and exacerbated existing ethnic and regional divisions. As Raila Odinga noted in a 2016 speech, ethnic mobilization, a colonial ‘divide and rule’ legacy, became a primary tool for political competition in Kenya post-1963, transforming democracy into a zero-sum game for resource control rather than a vehicle for inclusive policy. The struggle becomes not about ideology, but about which ethnic coalition controls the state’s patronage network, a phenomenon scholars refer to as ‘neopatrimonialism’.
The Psychological Scars and the Call for Re-Creation
From a psychological perspective, the democratic experience in Africa is fraught. The colonial subject was systematically conditioned into a state of political and economic dependence. When political freedom (independence) was achieved, a new form of psychological contract was needed. The repeated failure of the liberal-democratic model to ‘deliver’ essential public goods, jobs, infrastructure, security, as promised in electoral campaigns, generates deep citizen cynicism and apathy.
This psychological weariness contributes to the democratic backsliding seen in the recent wave of military coups in West Africa (e.g., Mali in 2020 and 2021). When a coup is met with street celebrations, it is a desperate societal cry for an alternative, a break from an elite-captured system. It suggests that the formal democratic procedures have become, in the eyes of the populace, merely a facade for continued elite circulation and corruption.
This leads to a powerful, original conclusion: African democracy must move beyond ‘imitation’ toward ‘re-creation’. The core democratic principle ‘government by the consent of the governed’ is not alien. It is universally human. But the vehicle (the mechanism) must be indigenously engineered to resonate with the social, legal, and anthropological realities of the continent.
The Unfinished Verdict
Was democracy ‘meant for Africans’? In its classical, adversarial, winner-takes-all form, imported tabula rasa, history suggests it has often been a poor servant and a source of political instability, not because of a deficit in the African people, but because of a flawed structural inheritance and its vulnerability to elite capture.
However, the spirit of democratic governance accountability, consensus, and the peaceful, rights-based exercise of power is profoundly rooted in African societies. Nelson Mandela, in his 1994 presidential address after the end of apartheid, spoke not just of voting, but of human dignity and reconciliation, embedding a deeper, more Africanized meaning into the democratic project. The challenge remains to bridge the gap between the liberal-procedural ideal and the African-contextual reality, weaving an authentic thread of governance that serves the populace first. The African Union’s commitment, articulated in the African Charter on Democracy, Elections and Governance (2007), is a legal step toward this re-creation, affirming that the continent is ready not for borrowed governance, but for self-determined, accountable rule.
The writer is a legal scholar and writer
Similar Posts by Mt Kenya Times:
- Beyond CAB3: the structural failures eroding Zimbabwe’s politics
- Ramaphosa holds firm as impeachment call tests South Africa’s GNU
- WHO declares Ebola outbreak in DRC and Uganda a global health emergency
- MKU roars to top honours in Nairobi North conference league
- Activists move to court to stop hiving off of Nairobi National Park land
Mt Kenya Times